Naura Technology Group: Buy this Chinese Tech Leader

Naura Technology Group: Buy this Chinese Tech Leader
Photo by Daniel Pantu / Unsplash

On a muggy July morning, a ceremonial red ribbon fluttered outside Naura Technology Group’s newest plant on the outskirts of the capital. Inside, engineers in bunny suits nudge crated plasma‑etch tools toward waiting trucks bound for memory‑chip lines in Wuhan and Wuxi. The scene captures China’s semiconductor strategy in miniature: build at home, ship to China Inc., and chip away—tool by tool—at decades‑long dominance by Western titans Applied Materials (AMAT) and Lam Research (LRCX).

Founded from the 2017 mash‑up of Beijing Sevenstar and North Microelectronics, Naura has climbed from a peripheral wafer‑cleaning vendor to the world’s sixth‑largest chip‑equipment supplier by revenue, according to CINNO Research’s 2024 league table. It is now the only Chinese name in a global top‑ten otherwise ruled by the U.S., Japan and Europe.

Closing the technology gap

Naura’s gear still lags the best of Silicon Valley. Applied Materials’ latest high‑aspect‑ratio etchers and Lam’s finicky atomic‑layer‑deposition (ALD) tools are qualified at 2‑nanometer nodes with gate‑all‑around (GAA) transistors, a frontier Naura has yet to reach. But Chinese customers, hemmed in by U.S. export curbs, increasingly prize “good enough” over bleeding‑edge. The company’s plasma etchers and chemical‑vapor‑deposition (CVD) systems now cover most layers needed for 14‑nm logic and sub‑18‑nm DRAM—nodes where domestic fabs still spend the bulk of their capital budgets.

That home‑court demand is ballooning. Naura forecast 2024 sales of ¥27.6 billion to ¥31.8 billion ($3.8 billion–$4.4 billion), up as much as 44 percent from the prior year, and it posted record net profit of ¥5.62 billion ($777 million). By contrast, Lam’s China billings fell for the second straight year while Applied Materials warned of a “mid‑teens” percentage hit from Washington’s latest restrictions.

Hand from the state

None of Naura’s ascent would be possible without Beijing’s wallet. Public filings show the company booked $51 million in explicit government subsidies in 2023—roughly the size of its entire R&D budget a decade earlier. It also drew a ¥1.5 billion ($207 million) equity injection from the second phase of China’s “Big Fund” and wears the coveted badge of a “Little Giant,” a program that bundles tax breaks, low‑interest loans and procurement priority.

That largesse is intensifying. In April the industry ministry floated a plan to merge some 200 domestic toolmakers into “about ten national champions,” with Naura tipped to anchor one cluster. The strategy is clear: build scale fast enough that even sweeping U.S. entity‑list sanctions—Naura was added to Washington’s list in December—cannot choke supply.

The wider Chinese semi‑cap landscape

Naura is hardly alone. A cadre of specialist compatriots is carving out niches once thought the preserve of Tokyo or Santa Clara. AMEC is winning slots for its high‑selectivity plasma etchers in 5‑nm logic nodes from Shanghai to Singapore; ACM Research and state‑backed Hwatsing Technology battle for leadership in chemical‑mechanical polishing; Piotech excels at plasma‑enhanced CVD for 3D‑NAND; while Kingsemi builds litho‑track gear now qualified at 28‑nm. Together, the five largest domestic vendors controlled roughly 45 percent of China’s wafer‑fab equipment market in 2024, up from 17 percent five years earlier, according to consulting firm TrendForce.

Each enjoys its own cocktail of municipal land grants, tax holidays and low‑interest loans, but competition is fierce. AMEC, for instance, spent ¥3.9 billion on R&D in 2024—triple its 2021 outlay—to stay within half a node of Lam. Consolidation is accelerating: Naura this spring took a 9.5‑percent stake in photolithography‑track maker Kingsemi, a deal flagged by TrendForce’s M&A tracker. Beijing’s ultimate goal is a handful of giants that can each rival a Western peer across multiple process steps.

Where the road leads

If policy winds hold, analysts at CITIC Securities reckon Chinese fabs will pour $150 billion into equipment through 2030, triple the cumulative outlay of the previous five years. Naura already supplies 80‑plus percent of cleaning and more than half of CMP tools to domestic foundries, and aims to lift its etch share to 30 percent by 2027 from roughly 15 percent today, executives say privately. The company has also begun exploratory work on home‑grown deep‑ultraviolet lithography—an audacious bet given ASML’s decades of head start.

Assuming it merely keeps pace with projected mid‑teens growth in China’s tool spend, Naura’s revenue could top $8 billion in five years. That would still be one‑third of Lam’s current sales but enough, in CINNO’s model, to vault the Chinese firm into the global top four. The wild card is whether Naura can win meaningful orders abroad. Industry veterans doubt it can while its tools trail a full node behind, yet a handful of Southeast Asian memory makers have begun pilot runs, lured by 20‑percent price discounts and Beijing‑backed financing packages.

Risks and rewards

Plenty could still go wrong. U.S. curbs could tighten again, cutting Naura off from vacuum pumps, lasers and control software it still imports. Chinese chip demand could falter if smartphone or electric‑vehicle sales stall. And history shows that gaps at the bleeding edge widen quickly; Lam and Applied each spend more than $4 billion a year on R&D—roughly Naura’s entire revenue base.

Yet it would be a mistake to dismiss the Beijing newcomer as merely a beneficiary of industrial policy. The company’s 12,000‑odd engineers turn out incremental but relentless process tweaks, and their tools now sit on every line of China’s largest foundry, SMIC. Once a customer is won, switching costs are high: recipe‑qualification cycles can run six months and tens of thousands of wafers.

The bottom line

For investors, Naura offers a rare pure‑play on China’s push for chip self‑sufficiency—and a hedge against the export‑control squeeze that clouds earnings growth at Applied Materials and Lam Research. The shares price in plenty of good news, but the runway is long: more than half of the equipment inside a leading‑edge Chinese fab is still imported, a share Beijing vows to cut below 30 percent by 2030.

Put differently, the ribbon‑cutting on that Beijing loading dock is likely the first of many. Whether Naura can match Western rivals on the toughest layers remains to be seen, but on the layers China needs most, tomorrow’s trucks—and tomorrow’s profits—are increasingly painted bright Naura blue.